Fourth Circuit protects Booking.com's trademark

February 6, 2019
Share this Post: 

The United States Patent and Trademark Office, also known as the Fourth Circuit, deals with trademark standards for companies whose names consist of generic words and internet domains, has confirmed the branding protection of travel website giant, Booking.com.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office had argued that Booking.com could never be protected because the term is generic, not descriptive, but a federal judge in Virginia sided with the company in 2017, and the Richmond-based federal appeals court upheld that ruling 2-1 Monday.

“Unlike general terms such as ‘crab house,’ looking to the component parts of a domain name may not unambiguously represent the primary significance of the term as a whole given that the relevant public may recognize domain names to indicate specific locations on the internet,” U.S. Circuit Judge Allyson Duncan wrote for the majority. “Thus, even where the domain-name-as-mark technically describes the service provided, it does not necessarily follow that the public commonly understands the mark to refer to the service broadly speaking.”

In its brief, Booking.com called trademark protection necessary to stop “unscrupulous competitors [that] prey on its millions of loyal consumers.”

But U.S. Circuit Judge James Wynn argued in a dissent Monday that this is a problem of the company’s own making. 

By choosing to operate under a generic domain that describes the nature of the services it offers, Booking.com is able to “attract the wealth of customers who simply search the web for that service,” wrote Wynn, who was appointed to the bench by President Barak Obama.

“However, in electing that benefit, the entity accepts a trade-off,” the dissent continues. “It must forego the ability to exclude competitors from using close variants of its domain name. On the other hand, the entity can choose to operate under a non-generic domain name — and thereby potentially limit, at least before it has built consumer awareness of its branding, the universe of potential customers who will find its business. Trademark law affords an entity that selects this latter option a special benefit. It can bar competitors from trading on any goodwill and recognition it generates in its domain name.”

Read more here

Join us in Bangkok the 19th to the 21st of March for the Property Portal Watch Conference.

Property Portal Watch Bangkok Conference. Mar 19-21, 2019

February 6, 2019

Subscribe to our mailing list to get the famous, free Friday newsletter!

News and analysis to help build better online marketplace businesses, in your inbox, every Friday

Related News

Jpmorgzedited
JP Morgan Global Online Classifieds Report 2024: Key Highlights Include REA, Scout24 and Rightmove

JP Morgan released its Global Online Classifieds report in November 2024, with marketplace giants REA Group and Scout24 SE both...

Read More
News Roundup 13Dec 1
News Roundup: LeBonCoin, Scout24, Dubizzle, Emlakjet, SearchSmartly

As the year draws to its inevitable close and holiday spirit takes over, a slow news cycle means we are...

Read More
All Uk Portals London 2
UK Roundup: Rightmove, Zoopla and OnTheMarket All Make Announcements

In the United Kingdom, Rightmove and Zoopla have both announced advertising campaigns while OnTheMarket has released its annual review for...

Read More
Zoopla Header 1 3
"AI is a Game-Changer, and We're Obsessed", says Zoopla COO Rich Hayes

In the final part of Online Marketplaces' exclusive interview with Zoopla CEO Charlie Bryant and COO Rich Hayes, we zoom...

Read More

Editor's Pick