Property portal giant, Purplebricks, rebuts all claims that it has manipulated Trustpilot reviews to a larger positive feedback from reviewers.
It has also denied that it invites customers to post their reviews at too early a stage of transactions. Its comments come after publication Wired ran a highly critical story under the headline: “Are Purplebricks’ glowing Trustpilot reviews too good to be true?”
The sub-headline says an investigation has “found evidence” that Purplebricks “selectively screens” reviews. The article says that of 69,000 reviews on Trustpilot, 89% are as positive as they could be.
“[They] achieve the top rung of Trustpilot’s five-point rating system: excellent.”
There are 7% ‘great’ reviews, 1% ‘average’, 1% poor, and 3% ‘bad’ says the article. The article compares Purplebricks’ reviews on Trustpilot with those it receives elsewhere, including on allAgents.
Wired says it asked KwikChex, a website it describes as tackling “online distortion”, to investigate, and says it found evidence that Purplebricks is mostly likely “gaming the system”.
KwikChex Director Chris Emmins said: “That doesn’t necessarily mean that thousands of fake reviews are being published, but there are ways to game or manipulate the system to achieve very strong results.”
Read more here
Join us November 12-15 for the Property Portal Watch Conference Madrid 2019.
Idealista says it experienced the biggest drop in listings volume in its history in the final three months of 2024....
Read More
Aurum PropTech, the parent company of Indian rentals marketplace Nestaway, says that its relentless focus on unit economics has paid...
Read More
"Unlike generalist portals that must cater to broad and diverse audiences, we target a small percentage of the market—but one...
Read More
The publicly listed Chinese real estate marketplace operator FangDD has withdrawn a patent purchase agreement worth $35 million after failing...
Read More
